Skip to content

Snapshot

↓ StressWorkplace RCTs show meaningful reductions and higher wellbeing.
↑ FocusShort practices improve attention and communication tone.
ROI SignalsEnterprise cases report productivity gains and reduced absence.

Bottom line: Embedded, measured programmes drive calmer teams, clearer meetings, and better outcomes.

Proof Points

Meta-analyses (workplace RCTs)
Reduced stress/burnout; ↑ wellbeing & job satisfaction; effects maintained short-term.

Vonderlin 2020

SAP (enterprise)
~200% ROI reported; engagement ↑, absenteeism ↓.

Reuters

Aetna (enterprise)
~62 mins/wk productivity gain; ~$3,000 value pp/yr (reported).

Healthcare Dive

ROI at a Glance (illustrative)

LineAssumptionIllustration
Participants10,000 employees · 20% uptake2,000 people
Productivity62 mins/wk × 48 wks~99,000 hours
Value~£55k/1,680h loaded cost~£3.24m
Programme cost£120 per participant£240k
Indicative ROISingle year~13.5 : 1

Tune to your salaries, uptake, and verified outcomes.

How a 12-week pilot typically runs

This is an example timeline; scope and cadence are tailored to your organisation.

Weeks 0–2 · Design

  • Exec sponsor + HR/Finance/DEI/Ops.
  • Target groups (managers/high-load teams).
  • Baseline: stress, engagement, absence, presenteeism.

Weeks 3–6 · Enable

  • Live cohort sessions (6–8 weeks) + micro-practices.
  • Manager module for culture signal.

Weeks 7–12 · Run

  • Measure pre/mid/post + 12-week follow-up.
  • Embed into meetings and focus blocks.

Decide & Scale

  • Review effect sizes by participation dose.
  • Build ROI narrative; expand to priority teams.

Discuss a pilot for your organisation

Book a short call to align on goals, measurement, and a right-sized rollout plan.

Book a discovery call View services
Calm horizon

Business enquiries

Tell us a little about your team and aims. We’ll reply within 2 working days.

References

  1. Deloitte (2024). Poor mental health costs UK employers £51bn a year. Press release, 17 May 2024. Link. Series overview: Link.
  2. Gallup (2024). State of the Global Workplace — Key Insights. (Engagement ≈ 21%; low engagement cost ≈ US$8.9T). PDF: Link. Overview: Link.
  3. Vonderlin, R., et al. (2020). Mindfulness-Based Programs in the Workplace: A Meta-Analysis of RCTs. Mindfulness, 11, 1579–1598. (Hedges’ g ≈ 0.32–0.77; effects ≤ 12w). Open access: Link | PDF: Link.
  4. Reuters (2018). At Germany’s SAP, employee mindfulness leads to higher profits. (~200% ROI reported; engagement↑, absence↓). Link. See also Mindful.org summary: Link.
  5. Healthcare Dive (2017). Aetna: Mindfulness program boosts productivity, cuts costs. (~62 mins/wk productivity; ~$3,000 pp/yr; 7% ↓ healthcare costs—reported). Link.
  6. WHO (2022). Guidelines on mental health at work. Actions across organisational and individual levels, incl. worker/manager training. Link.
  7. Michaelsen, M. M., et al. (2023). Mindfulness-Based and Mindfulness-Informed Interventions at the Workplace: Systematic Review & Meta-Regression of RCTs. (Positive effects on health/work outcomes.)
  8. Bartlett, L., et al. (2019). Workplace Mindfulness Programs: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. (Improvements in perceived stress & mental health; moderators incl. format/dose.)
  9. Chin, B., et al. (2018). Reducing Perceived and Momentary Stress in the Workplace: RCT comparing 6-week vs 1-day training. (Greater reductions with higher dose.)

Sources & Notes: Enterprise figures (e.g., SAP, Aetna) are internal/self-reported and should be validated within your context. We recommend agreeing baselines, tracking participation “dose,” and running follow-ups to confirm impact and inform scale-up.